The creator and director’s answers to the question are exactly the reason why I’m rooting for Indiana Jones to win out at the box office this weekend:
The quick answer is no. But “Sex” creator Darren Star has another theory.
“Their girlfriends are going to take them,” Star said. “And they’re going to like it.”
Or at the very least, pretend to like it. Director Michael Patrick King suggests that men who want sex ought to see “Sex.”
“I think if you’re in a relationship with a woman and you take her to this movie, she’ll feel very happy … and open,” King said.
Reviews of the film have been negative, with Daniel M. Kimmel’s my favorite so far:
…it’s like being trapped in a dentist’s office with nothing to read but an old issue of Vogue.
UCLA Medical Center and its most accomplished liver surgeon provided a life-saving transplant to one of Japan’s most powerful gang bosses, law enforcement sources told The Times.
In addition, the surgeon performed liver transplants at UCLA on three other men who are now barred from entering the United States because of their criminal records or suspected affiliation with Japanese organized crime groups, said a knowledgeable law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity.
[...]
There is no evidence that UCLA or Busuttil knew at the time of the transplants that any of the patients had ties to Japanese gangs, commonly called yakuza. Both said in statements that they do not make moral judgments about patients and treat them based on their medical need.
Lately, I’ve been running into an annoying trend on mainstream news sites — publishers are sectioning articles into multiple pages. They will tell you that they do so to improve readability, page loading times, etc., but what it boils down is page view counts and advertising impressions. However, I’ve noticed that a lot of these sites will break a relatively short article into 4+ pages, with each page being around 4 paragraphs in length. Give me a break. When I run into these kind of articles, I read the first page and move on. Mike Davidson sums up the situation nicely:
Over the last several years, many publishers have convinced themselves that breaking up stories into sometimes as many as ten pages is an acceptable way to present content on the web. The realistic ones at least admit that it’s a cheap way to boost stats. The disingenuous (or naive) ones actually posit that they are improving readability and usability for their audiences by reducing scrolling. Because scrolling is so hard.
Additionally, I’ve seen a number of sites run top ten list-style articles, with each item in the list getting its own page. This format really breaks down when the list contains a lot of entries, such as the top 100 places to live in America, 2008.