The iPhone requires a fundamentally different approach to user interaction. Something that goes way beyond the obvious things like the multi-touch interface.
If you can have a background process running on your iPhone, what is that process going to do when it detects a state change? What happens with a buddy comes online, or a new piece of data is available, or when a long running calculation is completed?
[...]
You’re [sic] phone soon becomes a fricken’ pinball machine as multiple applications fight for your attention. With 24 notification permutations for every application, things will quickly get out of hand.
Calendar notifications are jarring enough for me, so I’m glad that it won’t be possible for any custom applications to deliver sound notifications when I am not actively using them.
In its second annual statistical report, the Alzheimer’s Association projects that 10 million baby boomers will suffer from the disease.
[...] Fewer people are dying from heart disease, stroke and conditions such as breast and prostate cancer. If you avoid those illnesses, or beat them through successful treatment, you still have to die eventually of something. And the older people get, the greater the chance they’ll develop, and possibly die from, Alzheimer’s.
One aspect of the report says that, if they live to age 55, women are nearly twice as likely to develop Alzheimer’s as men. The report’s authors say that’s also age-related. When researchers measure the risk of developing Alzheimer’s at any particular age, men and women show no real difference [...]. But to the extent that they outlive men, women are considered more likely to develop the Alzheimer’s.
The Project for Excellence in Journalism just released The State of the News Media 2008, its annual analysis of cable television news. The mediascape proved barren: on average, five hours of viewing would yield 71 minutes of politics, 26 minutes of crime, 12 minutes of disasters and 10 minutes of celebrities. Science, technology, health and the environment received just six minutes of coverage (with health and health care accounting for half of that.)
Newspapers, network news and online news all provided more science coverage, though not by much.
Bands have always sold CDs at concerts, and nearly every indie label has some sort of online storefront these days (see, for instance, Fall, Suicide Squeeze, and Rough Trade). What’s more recent is the trend toward offering digital distribution, often in fan-friendly formats like MP3 and FLAC. Reuters has a piece this weekend on three indie labels (Merge, Def Jux, and Sub Pop) that are examples of the trend, and it points out the obvious problem that such sites face: most music lovers will never visit a label-specific store.
But in the digital, long-tail era, such stores can succeed by targeting a niche fan base with exclusives, rarities, and out-of-print material. They can also cater to online buyers concerned about audio fidelity by offering lossless versions of tunes, something that the major stores don’t even make available.
I disagree with the Reuters report that says that music fans will not buy direct from a label through their web site. Just last week Trent Reznor made $1.6 million from Ghosts I-IV from his web site. Labels like Def Jux and Sub Pop have a large fan base and will be successful. The rise of lossless digital audio (i.e. FLAC) is a boon for consumers, offering identical quality as the CD with no digital rights management.
However, I think one potential issue is the cost of FLAC versus CD. The example in the article points to Our Ill Wills by Shout Out Louds. The CD is available for $13 while the FLAC is available for $11.49. The pricing on the FLAC version is a complete rip off. For only $1.50 more, you get the professionally pressed disc, which lasts longer than a burned CD, as well as artwork. I think Trent Reznor is more on target with his pricing. He charged $5 for the FLAC and $10 for the CD.